美中報紙對氣候議題報導之比較： 以第十五次公約締約國大會為例
A Comparison of American and Chinese Coverage on Global Climate Change: Discursive Analysis of Reports by New York Times and People’s Daily

李佳蓉

本研究就美國《紐約時報》與中國大陸《人民日報》對第十五次公約締約國
大會（COP 15）的報導，進行敘述性統計及論域分析，以探究新聞體制與文化
因素對新聞報導的影響。發現《紐約時報》因受調查新聞學及崇尚科學的文化傳
統影響，報導主題以他國對氣候議題的看法、氣候變遷科學證據與後果為主。《人
民日報》則因整合在政治科層組織之下，消息來源較少，同時亦受人情法則中「人
際互動須做面子及拉關係」影響，偏好報導國際關係主題。

The article presents a cross-cultural comparison of newspaper coverage of COP
15 and global climate change in America and China as a case study to analyze their
ideologies. Based on the results of descriptive statistical analysis and discursive
analysis, the article demonstrates that the New York Times presented more viewpoints
of sources on the issue of COP 15 and global Climate Change than People’s Daily.
Furthermore, the New York Times delved more in the scientific evidence of global
climate change while People’s Daily focused more on international relations. These
findings show that different news regimes and cultures might have impacted the
direction of their media coverage.

文化研究、全球氣候變遷、第十五次公約締約國大會、新聞體制、調查 新聞學、關係

Cultural Studies, Global Climate Change, COP 15, News Regimes, Investigative Journalism, Gao Gaunxi

2012.07.06

已授權

李佳蓉_全文_美中報紙對氣候議題報導之比較：以第十五次公約締約國大會為例.pdf