2022年9月1日《壹蘋》接手《台蘋》，聲稱將延續其精神，但是所有權移轉經常伴隨媒體立場的轉換，加上《壹蘋》負責人潘杰賢與中國關係不清，令人好奇《壹蘋》將如何報導中 國議題。本研究採取框架分析輔以批判論述分析，選擇的媒體分別為反共的《自由》、親共的《中時》，以及欲檢驗的《壹蘋》，分析三者針對「中共二十大」的報導。結果發現，《壹蘋》在採取的主框架及次框架與《自由》較為類似，但卻不同於《自由》堅定反共的立場，在不同報導上互有立場游移的矛盾狀況。此外，《中時》也非一昧附和中共，當涉及武力衝突、恐阻礙經濟發展時，《中時》普遍選擇以消極牴觸的態度應對。

 On September 1, 2022, Next Apple replaced Apple Dai ly(Taiwan) and claimed that it would continue its spir it. However, the transfer of ownership often leads to a change in the media stance. In addition, Next Apple owner Pan Jiexian has unclear relationships with Chi na, which is very confusing to wonder how will Next Apple report the China-related issues. This research a dopts frame analysis and critical discourse analysis, a nd selects Liberty Times, Next Apple, and China Time s to test how each of them reports “20th National Con gress of the CCP”. Research has found that Next Appl e was similar to Liberty Times, but it didn’t always op pose the CCP, so that its reports were a little contradi ctory. In addition, China Times didn’t agree with the CCP at all. When it comes to armed conflicts which m ight impact the economy, China Times would report with a negative attitude.